Free PDF Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols
Why should be this on the internet e-book Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols You might not require to go somewhere to check out guides. You can review this e-book Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols every single time and every where you desire. Even it is in our extra time or sensation tired of the tasks in the workplace, this corrects for you. Obtain this Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols now as well as be the quickest individual which completes reading this publication Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols
Free PDF Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols
Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols. Someday, you will certainly discover a brand-new adventure and knowledge by spending more cash. However when? Do you assume that you need to acquire those all demands when having significantly money? Why do not you attempt to get something easy at very first? That's something that will lead you to know more regarding the globe, experience, some areas, history, amusement, and also more? It is your very own time to continue reading routine. One of the publications you could enjoy now is Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols below.
As one of the book collections to propose, this Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols has some solid factors for you to read. This book is extremely suitable with exactly what you need now. Besides, you will likewise like this book Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols to read due to the fact that this is among your referred publications to read. When going to get something brand-new based upon experience, entertainment, as well as various other lesson, you can use this publication Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols as the bridge. Beginning to have reading practice can be gone through from numerous ways and from alternative kinds of publications
In reading Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols, now you might not also do traditionally. In this modern-day period, gizmo and also computer system will assist you so much. This is the time for you to open up the gizmo and remain in this site. It is the ideal doing. You can see the link to download this Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols right here, can't you? Simply click the web link and also make a deal to download it. You could reach buy guide Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols by online as well as prepared to download. It is quite different with the typical method by gong to guide shop around your city.
Nevertheless, reviewing the book Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols in this site will lead you not to bring the published publication all over you go. Simply keep the book in MMC or computer disk as well as they are offered to check out at any time. The flourishing air conditioner by reading this soft file of the Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols can be introduced something new routine. So currently, this is time to prove if reading can enhance your life or not. Make Covenant Theology: A Reformed And Baptistic Perspective On God's Covenants, By Greg Nichols it undoubtedly work as well as obtain all advantages.
"Baptists who embrace their historic Calvinistic and Covenantal roots have long since needed a robust and comprehensive treatment of Covenant Theology that includes the nuanced interpretations of the biblical covenants that a baptistic hermeneutic requires. This treatment by Greg Nichols does just that and more. As a devotee of the Westminster tradition (including its chapter, 'On God's Covenant with Man'), I differ here and there; sometimes significantly so. But there is so much to applaud in this volume and Baptists will do well to read this volume carefully and with much gratitude. A splendid achievement. I, for one, will insist that my Presbyterian students read it." - Derek W. H. Thomas
- Sales Rank: #428175 in Books
- Published on: 2014-02-07
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.02" h x .86" w x 5.98" l, 1.24 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 386 pages
About the Author
Award-winning author and journalist Greg Nichols has followed his penchant for place-based reporting from the "barrios" of South America to the steel towns of western Pennsylvania. In richly-told narratives, he writes about people who confront harrowing odds that test their strength and challenge their humanity. Nichols holds a B.A. in philosophy from the University of California at Santa Barbara, and an M.F.A. in creative writing from Emerson College. He lives with his wife in Los Angeles, where he likes to spend his free time reading, cooking, and traveling.
Most helpful customer reviews
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
A Reformed Baptist Standard for Covenant Theology
By B. Organ
This book is thoroughly Confessional (the Pastor has faithfully subscribed to the 1689 2nd LBCF for 30+ years), and is the basis for the companion audio lecture series that is freely available at the Confessing Baptist website or the Sovereign Grace Audio Treasures site (just type "Greg Nichols the covenants" in your favorite search engine) ... I have had few joys in theology greater than listening to these lectures with the book in hand to understand the ins and outs for a tricky theological topic, the Doctrine of the Divine Covenants. Nichols provides an inductive approach to his systematic categories, carefully respecting the prior place of exegetical theology, rather than imposing an untenable and foreign systematic approach upon the divine covenants. The careful listing of biblical covenants, of their particular terms, conditions and participating parties, and beneficiaries is examined in depth and detail. One crown jewel in the Pastor's careful treatment is how his work usefully investigates the Eternal Counsel of Redemption (in an appendix).
Another crown jewel in this presentation is a full chapter on contemporary modifications and developments around the theology of the covenants. Pastor Nichols unpacks the (relatively) controversial issues addressed not only by early groups of reformers, but also improved upon by recent reputable reformers, such as Murray, Robertson and Kline. There are other reputable Reformed Baptists treatments on the topic, but I personally prefer Nichols's scholarship.
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
Read it you may enjoy it.
By George
This is a book on Covenant theology that tries to clear up some of the misunderstandings about this movement within the Baptist fold. It indicates that some Baptist have taken a different course in the realm of theology and as such are not actually following the real way. To read this book is to sift through layers of change and return to a course that is true and profound.
4 of 9 people found the following review helpful.
Nichols' idiosyncratic perspective is not confessional
By Brandon Adams
Greg Nichols is a respected Reformed Baptist teacher. I have not had the opportunity to meet him, but I'm sure it would be a blessing to do so. I hesitate to offer my thoughts here for the simple fact that Nichols has been thinking through these issues for about 30 years longer than I have. However, I have been urged by others to share my concerns here on Amazon.
Nichols' book came along at a time when there really wasn't a systematic treatment of covenant theology from a modern, confessional baptist perspective. It therefore garnered tremendous support and enthusiasm. However, once the book came out, it became apparent that it was not a representation of historic reformed baptist covenant theology, as some anticipated, but was instead the idiosyncratic culmination of Nichols' thoughts on the topic. Of course, there is nothing wrong with that. We should all endeavor to think through issues on our own, not simply resting on the shoulders of those before us. The trouble, however, is that Nichols does not interact with any historic baptist material on the subject and he presents his view as confessional, which it is not.
[For those interested in a more faithful representation of of the 2nd London Baptist Confession’s view of covenant theology, please google “1689 Federalism”]
-----------
For the sake of space, I will simply focus on the chief concern: the concept of merit.
Nichols rejects the concept of merit, denying that Adam could have earned eternal rest/life through the covenant of works. In doing so, Nichols sounds frighteningly similar to Norm Shepherd. I do not believe Nichols has yet taken his denial of merit to its logical conclusion as Shepherd has done. But he shares the same starting point.
Norman Shepherd taught a false gospel of works righteousness at Westminster Theological Seminary in the 70s by arguing good works are instrumental to justification (though he later changed the way he expressed this principle). When asked in their ordination exam how we are justified, graduates were answering “by faith and works”. When asked who taught them that, they said Professor Shepherd. He paved the way for the Federal Vision. Edmund Clowney summarizes:
"The debate about justification arose from concern that Professor Shepherd was making obedience as well as faith instrumental to justification. This was occasioned originally by Professor Shepherd’s effort to deal with James 2:24. His argument was that since good works are not the ground of our justification, just as faith is not the ground of our justification, and since both are necessary for our justification, we may question the legitimacy of speaking of faith as the alone instrument of justification (WCF XI:2). Good works, too, may be said to be instrumental."
In 2002, Shepherd delivered 4 lectures titled “What’s All the Fuss?” regarding his views on justification:
What’s All the Fuss? (Part 1): The Biblical Doctrine of Justification
What’s All the Fuss? (Part 2): The Church Doctrine of Justification by Faith
What’s All the Fuss? (Part 3): Job Justified by Faith
What’s All the Fuss? (Part 4): A Parable About Three Men
The thrust of his lectures is to show that the Bible does not teach a works-merit paradigm. He presents his position as the “faith-grace” or “covenantal” paradigm and he opposes this to the “works-merit” paradigm.
"Well the preceding is only a sampling of the problems we run into on the works-merit paradigm. We become uncomfortable expressing biblical doctrines using biblical language. Texts get bent out of shape in order to make them fit into a paradigm that does not arise out of Scripture and is foreign to Scripture. And without meaning to do so or wanting to do so we can find ourselves compromising the integrity of what is written in the Word of God.
The biblical paradigm, I would suggest to you, is one that is consistently covenantal without the schizophrenic antithesis between the covenant of works and an antithetical covenant of grace."
-Lecture 2, @27:00
In lecture 1 he insists that the biblical doctrine of justification consists in forgiveness of sins only.
"According to Paul, justification is simply the remission of sin. Justification is the forgiveness of sin. A sinner is justified when his sin is forgiven so that he is accepted by God and becomes an heir of eternal life."
-Lecture 1, @11:15
It does not provide a righteousness not our own, it only forgives our sins. And forgiveness alone is insufficient to eternally save anyone. It merely makes us eligible for eternal life.
"By his death and resurrection, Jesus once and for all paid the death penalty for sin so that we could be forgiven. By his death and resurrection, Jesus gave us the power of a new life so that we could really live in communion with one another and with the Lord as covenant keepers. He wrote his law on our hearts so that we would obey and live."
-Lecture 2, @37:00
"Proverbs 12:28 “In the way of righteousness there is life. Along that path is immortality” That is salvation by grace in the Old Testament and it is also salvation by grace in the New Testament. The works-merit paradigm has no way of accounting for those words in Proverbs 12:28. In terms of that paradigm this is nothing but salvation by merit or works, but it’s presented to us in the bible as gospel."
-Lecture 2, @43:40
Faith is not belief in the work of Christ. Faith is our obedience.
"Through faith in Jesus Christ, faith in his blood, we can know now that we will stand forgiven, justified, in the day of judgment. This faith is an ongoing reality in our lives. We live every day and every hour of every day by faith. And that faith is a living, active penitent and obedient faith. [Inaudible] By the grace of God we have a living and active faith. The good news of the gospel is that the just will live by faith, even though they do not deserve, in themselves, to live. We are pilgrims on the path of life, the narrow path that leads to eternal life. The Bible calls it the way of holiness. By the grace of God alone we have been placed on that path and we stay on that path and we will reach our ultimate destination."
-Lecture 2, @46:00
"Yes we have tended to do that [separate the two hinges of justification and sanctification]. And the reason we do that is because of this works-merit paradigm that lies at the bottom of the way that we have structured this doctrine. Because in this paradigm where the meritorious ground for our salvation is the active obedience of Christ imputed to us and not anything that we do for ourselves. And again, within that paradigm that make sense. That’s what makes it evangelical. But it creates a situation in which now we hear any demand for righteousness in the bible, any demand for repentance, as, which of course is a matter of sanctification, as conflicting with justification by free grace so that the stress on sanctification becomes a threat to justification by free grace, within that paradigm. And the way in which people try to account for it is to say, well, the good works, the obedience will automatically flow once we have believed and been justified, then the sanctification will come along. But that isn’t the way that the bible presents it. We’re constantly exhorted to persevere in righteousness and holiness, without which we will not see the Lord. Then I say, what is the paradigm that accounts for that kind of biblical language?"
-Lecture 2, @56:00
"The active obedience of Christ is not the meritorious ground of our salvation because, not because of any inadequacy in it or anything like that, but because there is no such thing in the bible as obtaining salvation by the merit of works. Salvation after the fall or the gift of eternal life before the fall was never granted on the basis of the merit of works but was always a free gift that is received by faith. That is why Adam was tested on the point of faith. Will we live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God?"
-Lecture 2, @1:03:00
We are in the same position as Adam in terms of our need to obtain eternal life. The only difference is that when we sin, it is forgiven. But our works play the same role as they did for Adam before the fall. This is contrary to the London Baptist Confession
London Baptist Confession
"19.6._____ Although true believers be not under the law as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified or condemned, yet it is of great use to them as well as to others, in that as a rule of life, informing them of the will of God and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly; discovering also the sinful pollutions of their natures, hearts, and lives, so as examining themselves thereby, they may come to further conviction of, humiliation for, and hatred against, sin; together with a clearer sight of the need they have of Christ and the perfection of his obedience; it is likewise of use to the regenerate to restrain their corruptions, in that it forbids sin; and the threatenings of it serve to shew what even their sins deserve, and what afflictions in this life they may expect for them, although freed from the curse and unallayed rigour thereof. The promises of it likewise shew them God’s approbation of obedience, and what blessings they may expect upon the performance thereof, though not as due to them by the law as a covenant of works; so as man’s doing good and refraining from evil, because the law encourageth to the one and deterreth from the other, is no evidence of his being under the law and not under grace."
The confession articulates a contrast between the way our good works function and the way Adam’s good works functioned. His obedience to the law was as a covenant of works. Ours is not. This distinction is fundamental to the biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone articulated in the confession (note the affirmation of the imputation of active obedience):
"11.1._____ Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth, not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ’s active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness by faith, which faith they have not of themselves; it is the gift of God."
Shepherd is right that this doctrine of justification rests upon the works-merit paradigm and upon the concept of a covenant of works. Sam Waldron (reformed baptist) notes:
"[T]here is no place in Shepherd’s theology for anything like the dichotomy between law and gospel that lays at the foundation of justification sola fide for the Reformation. If there is no such thing as meritorious works, if Christ’s work was believing obedience, if the obedience of faith is the righteousness of faith, then we are clearly dealing with a system of doctrine that has no way to express the Reformation’s contrast between law and gospel. Such a system cannot consistently affirm the justification sola fide squarely built on this contrast.
Allegiance to The Westminster Confession is often understood as subscription to its “system of doctrine.” The Westminster Confession accurately represents the Reformation system of doctrine when it grounds its soteriology on a contrast between the law (“the covenant of works”) and the gospel (“the covenant of grace”). Shepherd has no place for such a structure in his theology and cannot, therefore, affirm consistently the “system of doctrine” taught in the Confession he cites so often in his writings."
-Faith, Obedience, and Justification: Current Evangelical Departures, p. 186
-------------------
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God’s Covenants
With all of that in mind, it is particularly troubling to see people continue to recommend Greg Nichols’ book as a faithful representation of the system of doctrine taught in the London Baptist Confession. Nichols’ book is idiosyncratic and not representative of the confession, nor its signatories (see, for example, here and here). Confessional Reformed Baptists should stop recommending his book as representative of our confessional views.
The similarities between much of what Nichols writes and what Shepherd teaches is striking:
From Greg Nichols’ “Covenant Theology”
1
In sum, Adam’s original relation to God was familial and filial-parental. Thus it was warm and affectionate, not cold or distant. It was not an impersonal relationship between “contracting parties.” It was not between a disinterested judge and an unrelated defendant, or a ruler to an unknown subject. Thus, a “covenant of works” model simply doesn’t comport with its filial-parental framework. Categories like “contracting parties,” “stipulations,” and “penalties” are foreign to this familial relation. Such categories might suitably define a contract between corporations forging a business venture through their lawyers. They seem woefully inadequate to define a parental prohibition. In Genesis 2:16-17 God addresses Adam, not as a lawyer, but as a Father. This prohibition is an integral part of Adam’s filial relation to God. Thus, the covenant of works model wrenches this prohibition from its filial foundation. This is my primary objection to imposing this motif and its categories on this prohibition. (337)
2
This conditional form [of the Adamic Covenant] is similar to the conditional form of the Mosaic covenant… Observe that if [Adam] had complied with the condition, he would simply have done what was required. He would not have merited or earned anything – because he merely gave what was owed, trust and compliance. (346-7)
God freely blessed Adam with the Sabbath and with the hope it symbolized. Adam did not earn the Sabbath by works. Thus, Adam did not merit his hope by works – but he could sin and forfeit his hope. The covenant of works motif seems to say that Adam had to earn the hope of eternal rest that God gave him freely as a privilege… By eternal hope I refer to this expectation of divine blessing once he fulfilled his mammoth vocation. When he had populated and subdued the earth, he would have entered his rest. (341)
3
An Evangelical Explanation of the Mosaic Covenant’s Conditional Form
In this conditional promise God doesn’t say: “if you repent and believe, then you will be my special people,” but, “if you keep my law, then you will be my special people.” God said to Adam, if you eat you will die, implying, if you obey you will retain life and Eden. Similarly, he said to Israel, if you obey, you will retain Canaan, but if you disobey, you will be judged and disinherited. As Adam lost Eden, you will lose Canaan…
This teaches the necessity of gospel obedience unto complete salvation… (Lev 18:5; Matt. 5:20; Rom 8:12-13)
Jesus warned that evangelical obedience was necessary to enter heaven… This is how the conditional promise of the Mosaic covenant applies to the Christian life. It demonstrates the necessity of perseverance in gospel faith and holiness. …The law is gracious because it teaches us that if we live a holy life, mortify the deeds of the body, and keep evangelically the commandments of God, we will go to heaven, not to hell. (233-4)
Norman Shepherd
1
One of the primary points emphasized in the Sandy Cove lectures (July, 1981) is that the obedience required of Adam in the “Creation Covenant,” had he rendered it, would not have been meritorious. Adam was a son, not a laborer. The concept of wages earned, reward merited, is not appropriate to the father-son relationship. This is not a point made somewhat incidentally by Mr. Shepherd along the way, but a point that is evidently fundamental in his theology of the covenant.
Reason and Specifications Supporting the Action of the Board of Trustees in Removing Professor Shepherd
2
Mr. Shepherd rejects not only the term “covenant of works” but the possibility of any merit or reward attaching to the obedience of Adam in the creation covenant. He holds that faithful obedience is the condition of all covenants in contrast to the distinction made in the Westminster Confession. The Westminster Confession states in Chapter Vll that the first covenant “was a covenant of works wherein life was promised to Adam, and in him to his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience.” In contrast, in the second covenant, the covenant of grace, the Lord “freely offereth unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in him, that they may be saved.”
Reason and Specifications Supporting the Action of the Board of Trustees in Removing Professor Shepherd
3
He describes the requirement of our covenant-keeping obedience in terms drawn from his description of Adam’s covenant-keeping. We have resources that Adam did not have, Mr. Shepherd shows. We have forgiveness of sins in the blood of Christ; we have the Spirit to move us to obey; but we also have the same covenant condition to meet, and the same threat for disobedience.
Reason and Specifications Supporting the Action of the Board of Trustees in Removing Professor Shepherd
As the Lord God came to Mount Sinai to deliver his commandments to Moses and all Israel, so also the Lord Jesus came to another mount to deliver the commandments of the new covenant to his disciples and to the church of the new covenant…. Far from abolishing covenant obligation, Jesus says, “Unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:20). (The Call of Grace)
The obedience required of Israel is not the obedience of merit, but the obedience of faith. It is the fullness of faith. Obedience is simply faithfulness to the Lord; it is the righteousness of faith. (The Call of Grace, 39)
---------------
Shepherd Analysis
"The ‘covenant dynamic’ of Mr. Shepherd makes the function of our obedience in the covenant to be the same as the function of the obedience of Adam in the covenant before the fall. … Adam’s covenantal obedience in the garden did not merit any reward; neither does our covenantal obedience. But both are required by the covenant command. The threat for disobedience is eternal death. This threat is as real for us as it was for Adam in the garden. The warning of the New Covenant must not be blunted or made hypothetical in any way. God’s threat to Adam or to Israel was not idle, and the same sanction of the covenant is directed against us in the New Covenant."
Reason and Specifications Supporting the Action of the Board of Trustees in Removing Professor Shepherd
Summary of Shepherd’s errors:
1) Denies the concept of merit
2) Therefore denies the covenant of works
3) Therefore denies Christ merited anything
4) Therefore defines forensic justification as only forgiveness of sins (rejects imputation of Christ’s righteousness)
5) Defines faith as including obedience (faithfulness).
6) Argues that the process of sanctification (regeneration) is prior to justification.
7) The “works of the law” that we are justified apart from are works done in an attempt to merit a reward (Rom 3:28). This does not have reference to “good works” of the believer (obedience of faith), which is necessary for justification (Gal 5:6).
8) Christ’s covenantal righteousness was his living, active, obedient faith. This faith was credited to Christ as righteousness.
9) The same obedience of faith is required of believers in every covenant. This active faith/obedience is credited to believers as righteousness (Gen 15:6; Rom 4:11; 1:5; 16:26)
10) Argues there is a “not yet” aspect of justification.
11) Our works will be judged on the last day to determine if we go to heaven or hell.
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols PDF
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols EPub
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols Doc
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols iBooks
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols rtf
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols Mobipocket
Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptistic Perspective on God's Covenants, by Greg Nichols Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment